There was an exciting item on NBC Information on Aug 16, 2012 titled; "Nidal Hasan prohibited from asking accountable to killing during 2009 Ft Bonnet shooting" By Kari Huus, NBC Information which mentioned that;
"Major Nidal Hasan, the Military doctor charged of undertaking the Nov 2009 capturing exercise at Ft Bonnet in Florida, desired to beg accountable Wed to 13 matters of premeditated killing but the assess said he could not take the request, the Forehead Everyday Telegram revealed. Under army law, Hasan is prohibited to beg accountable because the premeditated killing expenses bring loss of lifestyle as the highest possible phrase and the govt is seeking the loss of lifestyle charge in Hasan's situation."
If this personal, now considered as a native enemy, designed a enemy act, and desires to confess his shame, then he should be permitted to, he should also be permitted to pay the greatest cost for his criminal offenses, especially if he did them in a premeditated style which seems to be the situation, and he completely confesses it. Privileges should be provided, and the charged has the right to beg accountable if he selects. We seem to be worried with everybody's rights, and he is an U. s. states resident, but we are declining to allow him his right to beg accountable. I ask why?
"Major Nidal Hasan, the Military doctor charged of undertaking the Nov 2009 capturing exercise at Ft Bonnet in Florida, desired to beg accountable Wed to 13 matters of premeditated killing but the assess said he could not take the request, the Forehead Everyday Telegram revealed. Under army law, Hasan is prohibited to beg accountable because the premeditated killing expenses bring loss of lifestyle as the highest possible phrase and the govt is seeking the loss of lifestyle charge in Hasan's situation."
If this personal, now considered as a native enemy, designed a enemy act, and desires to confess his shame, then he should be permitted to, he should also be permitted to pay the greatest cost for his criminal offenses, especially if he did them in a premeditated style which seems to be the situation, and he completely confesses it. Privileges should be provided, and the charged has the right to beg accountable if he selects. We seem to be worried with everybody's rights, and he is an U. s. states resident, but we are declining to allow him his right to beg accountable. I ask why?
If the person desires to beg accountable he may be marched out of the returning of the trial and encounters penalties after the assess provides it. There's nothing incorrect with that, as that is instant and reasonable justice. Isn't that what we indicate as Americans? Shouldn't he be permitted to face at the front side of the shooting team and pay for his criminal offenses, criminal offenses he desires to confess to, and criminal offenses which have been completely recorded that he indeed drawn the induce and murdered those soldiers?
Now some could say it isn't right because he will die a martyr which is exactly what he wants. However if that is the situation, as per his Islamic perspective, there are other factors in Islam which would avoid him from being compensated in the next lifestyle, these could also be aspect of the justice, to create it reasonable, for example the blood vessels of a certain hoofed creature might be loaded up in his footwear before the performance, so we could fix the martyrdom problem very basically.
It's regrettable that in the U. s. Declares we don't seem basically walking the discuss when it comes to criminal activity and penalties. If we fall short to do this properly then we are subjugating and prostituting the whole procedure. Yes, I comprehend this is a philosophical controversy, but the laws are quite obvious, and the rights of a knight under army law are obvious, and so too is the good feeling that everyone confirms to stay under when it comes to justice, justice must be provided, the earlier the better for the individuals family members and for our country.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar